I'm starting the new year with the idea to blog each trading day. First, a little about myself. I'm a software developer and have been day trading for about a year. I've co-developed a trading package called ZoneTrader, which runs on NinjaTrader, and is available from TraderUSA.net. I'm not a trading expert. I've learned from some pretty good traders. And I hope I'm becoming a good trader myself.
Each day I hope to comment on what I see as bias and direction. I'll document the trades I actually take. And I'll post some charts.
I have three reasons to write this blog:No trades today, slowly crept higher all day, breaking macd divergence with each high and each low pivot. No good ABC trades. I need to figure out how to trade macd divergence and the trending A trade.
I'm currently trading the Emini ES. I have 4 charts, two long term charts and two short term charts. The short term charts are a 233 tick and a 288 tick, and the long term charts are an 1152 tick and a 7500 volume. You can read more about why the 1152 tick chart in this blog about cme unbundling. If you have a spare two hours, you can watch my ZoneTrader Presentation.
I still have a day job, so I only trade part-time. I have charts up all of the time. But I'm mostly interested in trades from about 8:20am EST until 10:30am EST. I give charts my full-time attention from about 9:15am until about 10:00am. Generally, I follow most of the trading day recommendations from TraderUSA.net. Specifically, I'm careful, or don't trade at all, on days immediately after a major holiday, on contract rollover day, and FOMC day.
So onto todays trading analysis...
It's risky to make predictions. I really have no clear idea of what's going to happen today (otherwise I would of traded it). But if I had to guess, I think we'll go long from this area (1125 X low and 1127 support). It appears to me that big traders are moving the market long. The news this morning was bad, but we hardly reacted to it. And we've continued to see macd divergence.
I like the above trade even more in post market review. Not only was it just a few ticks shy of forming an A and a B in the right place, but the small triggers are coming through the big triggers, the bias is long, and we have lots of support now below us.
We did get that run up from 1127 that I predicted above. Had I been in that trade, the safe thing to do would of been to lay off half at either the zsr at 1130.50 or at the upper balance line at 1131. The remainder I would of targeted the 1133.25 zsr, which we never hit; so the second half would close out at either a 6-8 tick trailing stop from 1133 high, at somewhere between 1131.25 to 1131.75 when the small triggers closed down.
For the remainder of the day, the @ES behaved pretty well. Although there was really only one safe trade, and I'm not sure how much we would of gotten out of it.
The B short on the 1152 that was tick perfect to the projection of 1132 at 11:03am, however, it occurred on the wrong side of the big triggers so I would of passed. The F short occurred pretty close to the big triggers and at a zsr, and had I been trading I hope I would of gotten this for a few points. Entry would of been either the zsr at 1130.25 or wait for the small triggers on the 288 to turn, first half off at 1127 might not of filled, and second half off probably with a 6 tick trailing stop. This is too bad because the A short at 1:47pm happened right where it should of at the midband 1129.25, and it would of been nice to hold on through this, and take the remainder down to the X again.
The X at around 2pm was another trade opportunity. There was lots of other support in this area, with a zsr at 1127 and another at 1126.75 and a 1:1 at 1127. Had I targeted the 1:1 at 1125.50 to go long, as I probably would of (or at least I might of shot for 1125.25 splitting the difference), I would of missed this trade.
Overall the markets behaved relatively well today. We had our first successful ABCF series on the 1152 for the new year (two trading days). And while we had macd divergence on the short term charts, there was no divergence on the long term charts.